Leave your
mind alone, James Thurber counseled. Wise advice, but a
nation of self-improvers isnt about to take it. A mind is a
terrible thing to waste: Thats more our style. Now President
Clinton wants a national crusade to teach every junior high
school student to log on to the Internet, in the interest of making American
education the envy of the world. Man!
 In
an ad for ABCs evening news, anchorman Peter Jennings
offers his philosophy: If we can open peoples minds just a
little, weve succeeded. Oh, dont be so modest, Peter!
I grew up in a more innocent America, where having a mind, let
alone an open mind, was optional. In that dark pre-Cronkite era, Douglas
Edwards read the news every evening, and he wasnt trying to open
your mind for you; he just told you what had happened that day. It never
occurred to him or any other newsman that their role in the nations
life was that of consciousness-raising missionaries to the mind.
Its revealing that Mr. Jennings confuses
reporting facts with opening minds. Its even more revealing that he
assumes that his own mind is a model of openness that his viewers would do
well to emulate. This explains a lot about the way he colors the news: he sees
giving the facts a slight leftward twist not as a failure of journalism, but as
its fulfillment. I dont mean to shoot the messenger, but I wish he
could be content to deliver the message without rewriting it for us.
When the latest O.J. Simpson verdict was
announced, Mr. Jennings went into a weird riff on race
relations whose point, as nearly as I could gather, was that it was somehow
unseemly for a largely white jury to convict a black man of a crime.
Dont hold me to that; my paraphrase may be unfair. But I had the
unmistakable feeling that he was trying to open my mind again.
After all, Im a white male. And its white males
who always seem to be desperately in need of consciousness-raising, at least
in the view of those who specialize in raising others consciousness.
Of course Mr. Jennings is a white male too, but hes
Canadian, which is to say a little more evolved than your
American white male, who has a lot of right-wing hang-ups peculiar to this
country hang-ups about race, sex, gun control, socialism.
Ive noticed that the more you evolve, the further left
you seem to go. Thats why I try to resist the evolutionary process.
By its logic, the most highly evolved being of recent times was Mao Zedong.
To my way of thinking, it behooves one to keep in touch with ones
cave-man roots.
![[Breaker quote for Leave My Mind Alone: Our tutors]](2007breakers/071009.gif) Mr. Jennings
shares with the president a view of the American people as a sort of gigantic
kindergarten class waiting for their tutelage. Their notion of enlightenment is
to have the whole class chanting in unison, Diversity is good! Diversity
is good!
After all, as the president reminded us, diversity
is our greatest strength. That must be why he wants the federal
government to make sure all children get the same kind and degree of
education.
G.K. Chesterton said that the purpose of an open
mind, like that of an open mouth, is to close on something. If you still doubt
O.J. Simpsons guilt, for example, are you really
open-minded in any commendable sense? Or is your mind simply closed
against the evidence?
In fact its nonsense to say flatly that a mind should be
open or closed. The real question is when, not
whether, to close it. Of course its wrong to close it prematurely. But
at some point you have to make a commitment about the truth of things.
To many people, having an open mind seems to mean assuming
that those who disagree with them must have closed minds. If you assume
that, your attitude toward others is likely to be not that of the
conversationalist who is curious about the views of his interlocutors, but
that of the missionary confronting savages, or Peter Jennings addressing his
viewers.
Joseph Sobran
|