We're
supposed to smirk automatically at the phrase conspiracy theory, as if the
very idea of a conspiracy were somehow outlandish and, well, paranoid. But
federal prosecutors seem to have made a pretty convincing case that Terry
Nichols and Timothy McVeigh conspired to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah
Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. At least nobody is suggesting that
all the jurors in the two trials were loco.
 The
idea of conspiracy is essential to criminal law. It means nothing more than
secret cooperation to commit criminal acts. It's implicit in such common
expressions as accomplice, organized crime, and
getaway car. The alternative is to believe that criminals always act
alone. Yes, and musicians always play solo.
Of course there are silly conspiracy theories. That doesn't mean
that there aren't also sane and sophisticated conspiracy theories. Those who
indiscriminately deride curiosity about conspiracy are often trying to steer
our attention away from the possibility of official corruption, the existence
of which is pretty well attested.
But the most damaging corruption may not consist in illegal
acts. Just as there is a criminal underworld that continuously
conspires to break the law, you can think of the political process as the
working of an overworld in a sort of continuous conspiracy to
remake the laws to suit itself.
If the widget industry can get tax subsidies by persuading
legislators to make laws in its favor, no crime has been committed. And this
can be accomplished without gross bribery. Key senators and congressmen
may be receptive to the argument that new, high-tech widgets are vital to
national defense (and might be manufactured in those honorable gentlemen's
states). This patriotic proposal may be transacted over an informal lunch,
immensely boosting the profits of the widget industry, and the taxpayer
never the wiser.
When there are no limits on what the taxing power may be used
for, you are bound to get a whole class of people seeking to have it used in
their behalf. What would otherwise be illegal taking people's earnings
by force becomes legal when a government does it (just as inflating
the currency, otherwise known as counterfeiting, becomes increasing
the money supply when a government does or authorizes it).
The class of people who live and prosper by discreetly arranging
to have their larceny legalized is what I mean by the
overworld. Their ranks include politicians, businessmen,
educators, and many others. Because they control the legislative process,
they not only don't have to commit crimes, they don't even think of
themselves as shady operators.
![[Breaker quote for Underworld and Overworld: Continually conspiring to make the law]](2007breakers/070823.gif) These
folks do share certain characteristic attitudes. They
dislike extremism, by which they mean any political principle
that would keep government power and activity to a minimum. They are
equally opposed to communism and cutthroat capitalism
(whose evils they impartially equate with those of communism). They believe
in an affirmative role for government, flexible,
compassionate, and adapted to today's needs.
They tout the virtues of compromise. They favor
partnership between government and the private
sector, because the modern world is so complex and
interdependent. And of course they are scornful of
conspiracy theories.
Such people always sound reasonable, and they are the type who
control the government. If their sense of honor isn't very strong, it would
also be hard to catch them doing anything flatly illegal.
They aren't a secret cabal or a closed society. Anyone can join
their ranks anyone who wants to play the angles, to use the
government for his own special benefit at the expense of the unsuspecting
taxpayer.
An overworld exists in every society, a parasite class that
figures out how to get others to work for them while keeping the law on their
side. In many societies there are outright lords and slave owners who may
directly command their serfs and bondsmen; in a nominally egalitarian
society a more devious approach is necessary.
You may be working much of the day to support your neighbor
without knowing it. You know that a lot of your income goes to the
government, but you don't exactly know where it goes from there. That's
how the system is designed to work.
Joseph Sobran
|