Responses, Hot and Cool
The biggest news of September was not an event, but the obsessive commemoration of the 9/11 attacks. I watched CBSs stunning documentary showing how New York firefighters responded to the unprecedented calamity, and after 90 minutes I almost couldnt take any more. Then came an unexpectedly hilarious moment: an old fireman growling at a cameraman, in his New York accent, to move on: This aint [bleeping] Disneyland. The world was getting back to normal. Peggy Noonan marked the occasion with an eloquent reflection in the Wall Street Journal. She noted that the people in the World Trade Center, realizing that they were about to die in moments, didnt express hate or fear; they called home to leave messages of love. It was their last chance on earth to say anything to anyone, and all they could think of was I love you. What a beautiful reflection on human nature. President Bush, in his televised speech, used the moment to justify the Iraq war again. He said the attackers had made war on the Free World, and that Osama bin Laden meant to create a global Muslim empire, even if he hadnt actually been in cahoots with Saddam Hussein. It was as if, on learning that Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marxist, the United States had reacted to the Kennedy assassination by declaring war on the Soviet Union. Bin Laden is still in hiding, presumably in a cave somewhere, if he isnt dead. Yet Bush persists in talking as if he were on the verge of conquering the world! A cooler response was offered by John Tierney in his column in the New York Times: he expressed skepticism that the terrorists are even capable of duplicating their first feat. Our overreaction has taken the form of the terrorism industry, taking myriad superfluous precautions, when after all the public is so much on its guard now as to make a repetition extremely difficult, even if the government does nothing. Whatever the enemys intentions, its his actual capacity that counts. And as Tierney observes, the odds against any American being killed by terrorists are about 80,000 to one. Granted, the United States is now hated in the Muslim world. But there is hate, and there is hate. The Islamic fanatics are a special breed who have taken hatred to that rare level where the hater disregards the injunctions of his own religion (against murder and suicide, for example) and is willing to damn himself to take revenge on his enemy. Compare Shakespeares Laertes: I dare damnation! ... Only Ill be revenged. Laertes is not a Muslim. Any of us can succumb to total, self-destructive hatred. Its only realism to note that the great majority and preponderance of Muslims have not reached that pitch. The few who have are indeed a serious problem, and will remain so as long as they are antagonized. But as always, we need to keep our sense of proportion. Joseph Sobran |
||
Copyright © 2006 by the
Griffin Internet Syndicate, a division of Griffin Communications This column may not be reprinted in print or Internet publications without express permission of Griffin Internet Syndicate |
||
|
||
Archive Table of Contents
Current Column Return to the SOBRANS home page. |
||
|
FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information. |