The Gray Lady Shows Her Colors
For example, one of its regular columnists now is Maureen Dowd, spunky and hip. She often alludes to topics of pop culture the Times has sniffily ignored and hardly covered. You cant follow her meaning unless youre also reading New Yorks tabloids, the Post and Daily News, not to mention keeping up with the Michael Jackson trial.
The papers famous motto, All the news thats fit to print, leaves it in an awkward relation to the celebrity culture. Unless Im badly mistaken, it has reported nothing about Russell Crowes latest arrest and subsequent contrition.
Obviously the Times has heard about the New Journalism and too often tries to apply the techniques of fiction to news stories. Instead of the old-fashioned lead paragraph, packed with who-what-when-where facts, you are now apt to find an article beginning with atmospherics like this: Even the black cat that lived beneath Wrigley Field, fed and nurtured by stadium workers who apparently are not as superstitious as the patrons, seemed to sense that the Red Sox were coming. Nice writing, but if youre in a hurry to read the morning paper you may not want to settle in as for a Joseph Conrad novel.
What about the famous liberal bias of the Times? Its certainly there, not so much in overt ways as in the tacit assumptions the paper habitually makes about the reader. It seems to go without saying that the Times reader believes theres a government solution to every problem, and that he doesnt believe in the supernatural. The papers coverage of religion is minimal, and the activities of Christians papal elections, say are of interest fit to print only insofar as they are potential threats to liberal causes. When Cardinal Ratzinger was elected Pope, the Times reported the fact with an undertone of alarm. It had hoped for someone less well, Catholic. Even the huge Sunday edition has no religion section.
Catholics may write in the Times, so long as they are Garry Wills. That is to say, they are allowed space to attack the Church for being insufficiently liberal. Defenders of the Church hardly ever appear in the paper, and the orthodox Catholic reader feels a bit like a man attending a party he hasnt been invited to, with uncongenial people. The Times fairly cries out to him, Your kind arent welcome here!
The Times tries to make a show of ideological balance on the op-ed page (a Times innovation of the Spiro Agnew era), but even its conservatives are liberals that is, neoconservatives. For many years this niche was filled by William Safire, a chum of Ariel Sharon; today its occupied by David Brooks, who takes the position that theres no such thing as a neoconservative, thereby proving that he is one. Only neoconservatives deny the existence of neoconservatives, on the principle, I suppose, that Satans cleverest wile is to make us think he doesnt exist.
But whereas Safire blamed Christianity for the Holocaust, Brooks can write sympathetically about Christians. Still, Brooks is as statist as any liberal, and hes scornful of old-fashioned conservatives who favor limited government; he wants what he calls national greatness conservatism, with America dominating the globe (while maintaining a welfare state at home). Brooks once championed the war on Iraq, but since it has gone bad he has been rather subdued about it.
In general the Times has been ambivalent, but mostly skeptical, about this war never opposing it directly, but supplying plenty of ammunition, as it were, for those who do. This is the way it also handled the Vietnam war for a long time, avoiding explicit commitment until liberal opinion had solidified against that war.
The New York Times is of course the Establishment paper par excellence, a bellwether for all the major media, which imitate not only its news judgment but its cagey liberalism. But it contains plenty of good writing, and its an indispensable guide to what the most influential folk in America are thinking.
|Copyright © 2005 by the
Griffin Internet Syndicate,
a division of Griffin Communications
This column may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate
Archive Table of Contents
Return to the SOBRANS home page.
|FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.|