How Many Enemies?
can the United States defend itself in the
future? Some learned minds are wrestling with this question as new forms of
conflict take shape. In the past wars were fought on battlefields the way
football is played in stadiums. International law worked out rules of
engagement to which most governments subscribed most of the time.
Alas, writes former undersecretary of defense Fred Ikle in the Wall Street Journal, Americas future enemies may not fight according to these Marquess of Queensbury rules. Mr. Ikle foresees the use of nuclear, chemical, and biological warfare in that unanticipated region of warfare the United States itself. No force on earth can stand up to American military power on the battlefield, so we can expect future enemies to ignore the old codes. Some of these prospective enemies may not even be governments.
Past experience with terrorism is a poor guide for such a contingency, Mr. Ikle observes. Indeed. Such tactics as killing or kidnapping a few civilians may someday seem as quaint as the 78-rpm phonograph.
What would happen if a nuclear device devastated the heart of Washington, D.C. and our surviving government officials didnt even know who had detonated it? That wouldnt be terrorism, which is essentially a psychological tactic whose perpetrators usually claim responsibility; it would be a substantial act of war, by an enemy who might be impossible either to identify or locate.
The only sure result would be panic. There would be no point in surrendering; the damage would have been done, and a formal, Appomattox-style ceremony, with U.S. officials yielding to a tiny cell of expert bombers, would be absurd. But we can be certain that the official response would be a crackdown on the remaining liberties of U.S. citizens, the only people our government could control.
One reason it might be hard to pinpoint the enemy is that our government is making so many enemies. The United States dominates the globe, and many foreigners just cant comprehend that we are the good guys. In terms of their own cultures and interests, we may appear to them as the bad guys.
The narrow-minded Russians dont see why NATO should push up against their borders by including their neighbors, while excluding Russia itself. The pig-headed Arabs, Iranians, and others think the United States is making war on Islam. The self-centered Chinese consider us aggressive prigs who are muscling in on their part of the world. Small-minded Latin Americans think the United States is a bully.
Maybe all these people are wrong. And there are still many others around the world who like Americans. But the question is whether we can afford to antagonize so many people indefinitely. Its possible to be absolutely in the right and stupid at the same time.
If the people who hate us cant drive us out of their regions, some of them may want to bring the fight here. It would take only a sophisticated handful of weapons experts, out of several billion people. They wouldnt think of themselves as evildoers; they might see themselves as Luke Skywalker destroying the imperial Death Star.
The old European empires never had to worry about this, for the simple reason that most of their colonial peoples had only the most primitive weapons and no way to reach European capitals; retaliation was unimaginable. When the white man had a monopoly of gunpowder, the odds were so lopsided that the Europeans hardly thought of their Asian, African and American conquests as wars; wars were affairs between European states.
So far, Americans have paid for their empire only in the high taxes needed to sustain military forces that go far beyond any real defensive needs. Mr. Ikle doesnt use the word empire; he uses the customary formula, defense of American interests, which can cover anything, anywhere. But an empire it is, even if we prefer to call it world leadership, and the price could rise with stunning suddenness.
The best defense is not to make enemies in the first place. But this elementary prudence is now called isolationism (though it might better be called multiculturalism). If a big American city goes up in a mushroom cloud, isolationists will look like prophets.
|Copyright © 2005 by the
Griffin Internet Syndicate,
a division of Griffin Communications
This column may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate
Archive Table of Contents
Return to the SOBRANS home page.
|FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.|