The Kerry Ferry
The signs of desperation are abundant. Kerry is sinking in the polls, party insiders are blaming him for an uninspired campaign, and he has shaken up his campaign staff with only weeks to go before the election. Hes even taking advice from former President Bill Clinton, who may want him to lose this year so that Hillary Clinton can be the Democrats candidate in 2008.
True, Kerry has made lots of blunders and is a soporific campaigner. But what do the Democrats expect him to do? Their chief demand is that he sharpen the contrast between himself and George W. Bush.
But there are only two ways to do that, and neither of them would work. He could run to the right of Bush, but the Democrats themselves wont allow that, and nobody would believe him. Try to imagine Kerry calling for a contraction of the Federal Government, or reversing himself on abortion. Any such move would lose his base and aggravate his reputation as a flip-flopper.
Could he run to the left of Bush? There too Bush has left him little room, unless he wants to run as an all-out socialist. Bush has already established himself as the biggest spender since Lyndon Johnson, adding Medicare entitlements that will eventually cost trillions as Baby Boomers, whose numbers are roughly equal to the population of Germany, reach retirement age.
Bush may be the perfect politician for a democracy. He combines liberal policies with conservative rhetoric. Liberals presumably want Kerry to offer liberal policies with liberal rhetoric. But that would be an illusory contrast, and liberal rhetoric doesnt sell these days.
Kerry passed up the chance to create a real contrast with Bush on the Iraq war. In fact, this is what supposedly made him electable, according to the conventional wisdom du jour of last winter. The war was still popular then, so Kerry didnt oppose it, choosing instead to flaunt his own war record, in implicit contrast with Bushs.
Now the updated conventional wisdom du jour demands that he display a more vigorous, less nuanced contrast. But how? He has allowed the Republicans, amazingly, to turn his war record into a liability, while Bushs avoidance of Vietnam hardly seems to matter at all.
Poor Kerry! Far from being electable, he just isnt cut out for politics at least not outside Massachusetts, where a liberal Democrat can run a passive campaign and win by a landslide. To Democrats, a Massachusetts liberal is a moderate, so during the primary season they counseled him to keep right on doing what hed always done. It seemed to be working.
Well, Bush and the Republicans knew what to do with that! They learned a generation ago that Massachusetts is the Alices Looking-Glass of American politics. Whatever is taboo in the Bay State is a hot button in most of the country, and vice versa.
Kerry doesnt get it. The more he calls the Bush gang right-wing an epithet they dont deserve the more he helps them create the illusory contrast that serves their turn, by implying that he himself is left-wing.
Real right-wingers insist that we have what amounts to a one-party system, since both the Republicans and the Democrats share the same big-government premises. Kerrys real problem and its probably insoluble is to find, in only a few weeks, a way to beat a collectivist who poses as a conservative.
Kerry is trapped by the hypocrisy of both parties. He cant talk about the real contrast: that whereas Bush is a phony conservative, he, John Kerry is the true collectivist in this race.
Maybe Bill Clinton, with his extraordinary rhetorical agility, could talk his way out of this one by introducing distracting topics, but its probably too late for the lumbering Kerry, who cant change his wooden style. His ineptitude makes gentle Michael Dukakis look like a vicious streetfighter.
Still, its not all Kerrys fault. Even a better politician would find this a tough one. The Republicans have found the key to winning in a one-party system; the Democrats dont have a clue. As usual, theyre blaming their candidate for everything.
|Copyright © 2004 by the
Griffin Internet Syndicate,
a division of Griffin Communications
This column may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate
Archive Table of Contents
Return to the SOBRANS home page.
|FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.|