Amnesia at the Paper of Record
November 16, 2000
One of
the persistent big lies of our time holds that the Catholic Church,
and Pope Pius XII in particular, failed to oppose Hitler and were
silent during the Holocaust. This would have come as news
to Hitler.
The myth has been repeated in two
recent books and is often echoed in the New York Times, our
semi-official paper of record. But in fact, the
Times is flatly contradicted by its own reporting before and
during World War II.
A new study, Pius XII and the
Jews: The War Years, by Stephen M. DiGiovanni, shows that Pius and
his bishops engaged in a prolonged duel with Hitlers regime. Far
from being secret, the tension between the Third Reich and the Church was
quite public and DiGiovanni describes it almost entirely from
stories published in the Times while it was going on.
Piuss predecessor, Pope Pius
XI, had condemned the German National Socialist philosophy because its
exaltation of race and nation was opposed to what the Church calls
the natural law, the eternal moral order that even God
cannot change. No race or nation has the right to subjugate another. Pius XI
and Pius XII both condemned Communism for similar reasons: no state may
put itself above the divine law.
Upon becoming Pope in March 1939,
Pius XII issued an encyclical reiterating that the state must respect the
divine law, without prejudice to any race. This was taken by everyone as a
rebuke to Hitler. In 1940, over the protests of Hitlers ally Benito
Mussolini, the Vatican appointed two Jewish scholars to its academy of
science and another to its library. Louis Finkelstein, a prominent Jewish
theologian, praised the Pope for these measures. All these facts appeared
in the Times, which also praised the Pope generously in
several editorials.
In 1942, Pius intervened to save French Jews from deportation;
two French cardinals and several bishops also made what the
Times called a spirited written protest against
racial and religious persecution. The following year Pius assured
the chief rabbi of Jerusalem that he would, as the Times put
it, do all in his personal power to aid persecuted Jews in
Europe. Throughout the war Catholic leaders sheltered Jewish
children in France, producing what the Times called
an open rift between the Vichy government and priests.
After the war, Pius removed several French bishops who had cooperated
with the German and Vichy governments; this too was reported in the
Times.
In June 1943 the Times
ran a story headlined Reich Churches Resist Nazi Rule,
relating that the Catholic bishops in Germany had protested the
persecution of Poles and Jews. The Nazi press fired back with charges
that the Church was instigating unrest. A month later the German regime
put three Catholic bishops under house arrest and seized several convents,
hospitals, and other Church property. Thousands of priests and nuns were
eventually arrested, many of whom died in concentration camps.
In December the Vatican protested the
internment of Italys Jews; in early 1944 Romes Fascist
police forced entry into a basilica and arrested Jews taking sanctuary
there along with the priests who had sheltered them, over Piuss
protests. Again, you could have learned all this from the
Times.
When the Allies conquered Rome in
June 1944, the citys chief rabbi formally thanked the Pope on
behalf of the Jews. After the war the World Jewish Congress gave the
Vatican a gift of $20,000 in recognition of the work of the Holy
See in rescuing Jews from Fascist and Nazi persecution. Early in
the war, Albert Einstein had testified: Only the Church stood
squarely across the path of Hitlers campaign for suppressing the
truth.
This is just a sampling of what the
Times told its readers during the war years. It also quoted
both Nazi and Soviet authorities blaming the Church for the war they had
started together before their falling out, each accusing Pius of favoring
the other side. Later the victorious Soviets and Communists within
Western Europe charged the Pope with indifference to the mass murders of
Jews.
The Times, in a 1944
editorial, severely criticized the Soviets for their reckless,
unjust, and intemperate anti-Vatican
propaganda. Since then, for some reason, the Paper of Record has forgotten
its own meticulous contemporary accounts and adopted the crude Soviet
version.
Joseph Sobran
Archive Table of Contents
Current Column
Return to the
SOBRANS home page
|