Playing Monopoly
June 8, 2000
Now
that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson described as a
pro-business, conservative Republican, by the Wall Street
Journal has ordered the breakup of Microsoft, we should
pause to reflect on antitrust measures and monopolies of power.
Years ago I was asked: Why
dont you criticize Big Business the way you criticize Big
Government? A fair question. I answered that I wasnt
forced to deal with General Motors. I was free not to buy its products, and
it couldnt jail me for driving a Honda. By contrast, I had to pay the
federal government roughly the price of a new car every year and I
never got the car. My money was distributed among others who were
favored by the politicians.
Since then, Microsoft has replaced
General Motors as the emblematic giant corporation. And I do deal with
Microsoft. I use its products freely and voluntarily, as everyone
else does and they have become indispensable to my work, even at
this moment.
I
dont feel that I need Judge Jackson or Attorney General Janet Reno
to protect me from Bill Gates. Neither of them could do
what Gates has achieved. He is unique, a great innovator. They belong to
the huge class of interchangeable people who run the government
that is, who deal with people through the constant threat of force, which
is the essence of government. They can be replaced; countless others can
do what they do.
Miss Reno, after all, was Bill
Clintons third choice for her job. She will be remembered chiefly
for violent confrontations in Waco and Miami, and perhaps secondarily for
helping Clinton escape investigation by special prosecutors. People like
her are essentially parasites; they produce nothing to enhance our lives.
They are the people we really need to be protected from.
The definition of
monopoly in business has become highly technical
and manipulable. But the bottom line is that Im free to use the
products of Microsofts competitors. I could even go back to my old
Royal typewriter if necessary. But Gates attracts the predators as what
Tom Wolfe has called the Great White Defendant. Jackson
and Reno are basking in the glory of having nailed him.
Why is nobody talking about the real
monopoly of power that of the federal government? The word
federal has become a misnomer; there is nothing really
federal about a government that can claim authority over anything it
chooses to control.
The Constitution is an antitrust act
for government. It was designed to prevent the federal government from
becoming a monopoly of power, or what the Framers called a
consolidated government. A few specific powers were
delegated to it, and all others were denied to it. The point of the Tenth
Amendment is not, as is usually said, to protect states
rights, but to limit federal powers.
But power tends to accumulate, and
throughout the twentieth century the United States went the way of so
many European nation-states. It abandoned its tradition of federalism and
decentralized power, just as other countries were adopting communism,
socialism, fascism, and other variants of the consolidated state. The
interpretation of the Constitution was systematically and shamelessly
warped to authorize what that Constitution clearly prohibits.
But who will break up the federal
governments monopoly? Most Americans, drenched in
pro-government propaganda, are ignorant of the Constitution
especially if theyve studied constitutional law in a pricey law
school. Weve fallen for the prevalent but preposterous notion that
the interpretations of the U.S. Supreme Court somehow supersede the
clear, original, traditional, and logically inescapable meanings of the text
itself.
By inflating the meanings of a few
phrases, some of which arent even in the Constitution
interstate commerce, freedom of expression,
equal protection of the laws the federal judiciary
has helped create monopoly government.
A monopoly of the coercive powers of
government including the powers of taxing, regulating, arresting,
and confiscating is far more dangerous, and potentially lethal,
than any powers a private corporation can amass. Bill Gates cant
arrest his competitors; he cant lay armed siege to an eccentric
religious sect; he cant punish you for boycotting Microsoft. And he
cant distract attention from his troubles by bombing foreign
countries.
Joseph Sobran
Archive Table of Contents
Current Column
Return to SOBRANS home page
|