|Managing Editor /
Ronald N. Neff
Fear of the Smear(Reprinted from SOBRANS, July 2006, page 1)
Text dropped from the print edition
or modified solely for reasons of space appears in blue.
More than sixty years after Hitlers death, this seems to be the golden age of anti-Semitism, judging by the frequency with which the charge is made. Apparently anti-Semitism was the first word Abe Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, and the neoconservatives learned to pronounce right after mama and dada. An anti-Semite used to be a guy who hated Jews; now hes a guy whom Jews hate.
All right, thats too simple. But you see the point. Calling someone that name is, nowadays, the easiest way to do him a bit of no good. Its almost never applied to people who have actually harmed Jews, or urged others to harm them; its used for those who commit Thoughtcrimes against the Jewish state. Like racism, its use has widened as the actual evil has receded. The fewer racial lynchings we have, the more we hear about racism.
The charge of anti-Semitism doesnt have to be proved; and it cant be disproved. Its an assertion about motives, not actions. Thats the beauty of it: its unfalsifiability. Joe McCarthy was ruined for calling too many people Communists, even card-carrying Reds; but has Norman Podhoretz paid any penalty for calling too many people anti-Semites?
Any number can play, including gentiles. Taki was accused by his Catholic publisher. My fate was crueler: I was defended by mine. Bill Buckley denied that I was anti-Semitic, but wrote a sentence, or a chapter (with Bill, the difference may be unclear), adding that though I was innocent of the crime, I somehow deserved to be falsely accused of it. That was a little like saying, True, he was a guard at Auschwitz, but lets give him credit: he always showed up for duty on time. Thanks, Bill!
Even when an innocent man is falsely accused, you see, he is still guilty of ... of ... well, of having been accused. The charge itself is its own proof! Orwell and Kafka would understand. So would Stalin.
Most people dont really care whether the charge is true anyway. To them, the very fact that it was made is enough to warrant ostracism. Their reaction may be interpreted as follows: Uh-oh! The Jews are mad at this guy! Id better steer clear of him, or they may come after me too! This response implies, of course, that the Jews control everything, which is what Henry Ford infamously believed and which is what Abe Foxman seems to want everyone to believe. Some might call that belief anti-Semitic, but there you go. Weird, but true. The label is enough to terrify people, to make strong men tremble. (The racist label used to have similar power, but nobody thinks blacks run the country.)
No use saying, But Im not anti-Semitic! Automatic retort: Yeah, sure. Thats what anti-Semites always say. Pleading innocent only gets you in deeper. Denial is further proof of guilt. So what if its also what an innocent man might say?
Heres the real kicker, though: The burden of proof is on the accused, not the accuser. Since the word anti-Semitism is never really defined, the accused cant even know just what hes accused of, let alone whether hes innocent. It can mean anything from genocide to joking about Israels Amen Corner in this country, the phrase with which Pat Buchanan enraged Israels Amen Corner in this country.
Lots of neoconservatives claimed the label proudly, until it became a term of reproach, whereupon they decided it was nothing but an anti-Semitic code-word for Jew. In effect, they denied their own existence. As Milovan Djilas once observed, The Party line is that there is no Party line. But here its even crazier: the Party line is that there is no Party.
Recent case history: two distinguished professors, Stephen Walt of Harvard and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, have just published a long article on how costly the Israel lobbys success has been for the United States. Care to guess what theyre being accused of? Several neocons offered the clinching evidence: David Duke agreed with them! Before you say that two and two make four, make sure Hitler, or Pat Buchanan, never said so.
Now you might think its almost self-evident that two countries as remote and different from each other as the United States and Israel would have divergent interests, that what was good for one might sometimes be bad for the other, and so on. This is essentially all the two profs are saying, albeit with footnotes. But even self-evident truths, if applied to Israel, can become explosive and, yes, anti-Semitic.
Still, I think Jewish power is largely a mirage. True, there are powerful Jewish interests, and they can be nasty, but most Jews are only their distant relatives. Fear of the Jews is really fear of nuts like Foxman, whom it would actually take very little courage to stand up to. I think of a line in the film Millers Crossing, where the Irish hero says to the Irish mob boss, You dont hold elective office in this town, Leo. You only run it because people think you run it. When they stop thinkin it, you stop runnin it.
As I wrote shortly after the 9/11 attacks, When it comes to Israel, an American journalist speaks his mind at his own risk. That helps explain why so few voices in the U.S. press are saying what European journalists may say without fear. The neocons will learn that fear is a dangerous weapon to wield. Those who fear you today will hate you and fight you tomorrow. Osama bin Laden and George Bush will learn this too.
A version of this piece was originally published at
Takis Top Drawer, April 8, 2006.
Article copyright © 2006 by The Vere Company. All Rights Reserved.
This article may not be reprinted in print or
Internet publications without express permission
of The Vere Company.
Return to the SOBRANS home page.
|SOBRANS and Joe Sobrans columns are available by subscription. Details are available on-line; or call 800-513-5053; or write Fran Griffin.|
|FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.|