Shakespeares Early Poems(Expanded from SOBRANS, January 2005 pages 56)
Text dropped from the print edition or modified
solely for reasons of space appears in blue.
Who was Shakespeare? The answer to this old question depends on when his works were written. And I think there is vivid evidence, right under the noses of the academic scholars, that William Shakspere of Stratford was too young to have written them.
The first two published works of William Shakespeare werent plays but two long narrative poems, Venus and Adonis in 1593 and The Rape of Lucrece in 1594. Both were immediately recognized as great poems; both were also very popular, going through more editions than almost any of the individual plays.
Contemporary praise of Shakespeare always began by citing these two poems, not the plays. In 1598, for example, Francis Meres wrote that the sweet witty soul of Ovid lives in mellifluous and honey-tongued Shakespeare; witness his Venus and Adonis, his Lucrece, his sugared sonnets among his private friends, &c. After naming a dozen of the plays, Meres added that the Muses would speak with Shakespeares fine-filed phrase, if they would speak English. Other early tributes to Shakespeare likewise rated the two long poems above the plays, if they mentioned the plays at all.
This is surprising, because modern taste has ignored and, I would say, underrated them, the only works to bear dedications by Shakespeare (to the young Earl of Southampton). Because the poet calls Venus the first heir of my invention, scholars and biographers have assumed that both poems are among the Bards early works, written near the beginning of his career as a dramatist.
Oddly, these poems are the only two Shakespeare works that can be dated with any precision thanks to those dedications. Dating the plays is another matter, involving deduction, guesswork, and circular reasoning chiefly the assumption that William of Stratford wrote them, and must have written them sometime during his adult life, between about 1588 and 1616. If we accept this question-begging method of dating, these works written around 159394 must fall near the outset of his career in the theater.
But the scholars have gotten it all wrong. Venus and Lucrece are in fact fully mature works, written after most of the plays. Moreover, they all but prove that Will of Stratford couldnt have been the author we know as Shakespeare.
The orthodox belief in Wills authorship depends wholly, as I say, upon dating his works plausibly within his adult life span taking into account the first known dates of performance and publication (which prove next to nothing about when they were actually written), as well as clear stylistic developments. And the scholars have, on the whole, done a plausible job, given their premises. But there are serious difficulties, which they have done their best to explain away. And as well see, the two long poems present a problem that just cant be explained away if we posit Wills authorship. Put simply, was Will old enough to have written the works attributed to him?
First there is the problem of Hamlet, first published in a mutilated version in 1603 and in a far better one in 1604. The scholars date it around 1600, when, they reckon, Will had reached the peak of his genius. But this leaves them with the problem of explaining three references to a Hamlet play many years earlier the first in 1589, when Will may not even have arrived in London yet. The style of Hamlet, with its superbly flexible blank verse and discursive prose, is far too sophisticated to permit the inference that its an early work.
Solution? The scholars posit an older Hamlet play by somebody else. That would account for those vexing references. The trouble with this solution is that no trace of such a play has ever turned up. What the scholars do agree on is that Will of Stratford didnt write that supposed play. (I contend it never existed.)
Again, in 1591 Edmund Spenser published a poem saluting our pleasant Willy, a brilliant writer of comedy who had of late retired from the theater. This was long assumed to be Shakespeare, as the context suggests. But again, as the scholars eventually realized, in 1591 Will would have been far too young to have made much of a reputation as a playwright let alone to have retired.
Solution? The scholars have decided that Spensers Willy couldnt have been Shakespeare, but must have been some other Willy. But who? Nobody else fits Spensers description. What the scholars do agree on is that Spenser couldnt have been talking about Will of Stratford. So a purely hypothetical Willy joins a purely hypothetical Hamlet.
Which brings us back to Venus and Lucrece. According to the scholars, these poems were written around the same time as the earliest and least distinguished Shakespeare plays, such as the Henry VI cycle and the more farcical comedies (The Comedy of Errors, for example).
But here another dating problem arises, unnoticed by the scholars. Though we dont know the exact dates of the plays, we can approximately tell their relative dates by their style. The relatively early plays are marked by their very regular blank verse very good, but palpably inferior to the richer and far more irregular verse of the great tragedies. We know those tragedies were written later because they show the poet in much greater technical command of his poetic and rhetorical resources. This isnt an aesthetic judgment or a question of personal taste, but a matter of his skill in his craft, as when a composer advances from simple melody to the more difficult form of the fugue.
Some brief comparisons may illustrate the point. Here are a few lines from the first scene of The Comedy of Errors, usually dated around 1592:
By contrast, the latter two passages, written in difficult stanza forms and under the constraints of complex rhyme schemes, show the poet in full command of his medium, combining epigrammatic wit, rich alliteration, vivid colors, splendid images, a riot of vowels, an easy freedom of meter, a wealthy vocabulary, paradox, contrast, antithesis all this visible in just 20 lines! Here is the same poet, but at a far riper stage of his development. The amazingly concentrated power of expression these two poems exhibit is fully equal to that we find in Hamlet and Othello.
In short, by 1593 Shakespeare had already discovered what the English language was capable of. This means, for one thing, that the standard dating of the plays is seriously amiss. The real dates of the plays are several years maybe a decade or so, in most cases earlier than the scholars believe. When the poet wrote Venus and Lucrece, he was nearer the end than the beginning of his literary career.
The initial reception of these poems tends to confirm this. The poet spoke of his unpolished and untutored lines, but this false modesty fooled nobody. Nobody thought these were the work of a novice. Their mastery was obvious in every line: Bewitching like the wanton mermaids song. A lily prisond in a gaol of snow. Till he take truce with her contending tears. The pith of precedent and livelihood ... Earths sovereign salve to do a goddess good. Unpolished?
Those plays, we must conclude, were written many years before the two long poems. Which means that Will couldnt have written them, unless he wrote them during his boyhood in Stratford. Which means that someone else, someone much older than Will, must have written them someone who, by the way, was close to the Earl of Southampton.
That would perhaps be Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, a noted poet and playwright. In 1593 Southampton nearly married his daughter.
Return to the SOBRANS home page.
|SOBRANS and Joe Sobrans columns are available by subscription. Details are available on-line; or call 800-513-5053; or write Fran Griffin.|
|FGF E-Package columns by Joe Sobran, Sam Francis, Paul Gottfried, and others are available in a special e-mail subscription provided by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. Click here for more information.|