THE WANDERER, DECEMBER 22, 2005
JOSEPH SOBRAN'S
WASHINGTON WATCH
Democracy in Iraq
At least since World War I, American foreign policy
has been based on the assumption that democracy is the
best guarantor of world peace. But the Treaty of
Versailles did more to provoke an even worse war -- the
worst in human history -- than to prevent it.
Both wars came about despite the best efforts of
Popes Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII to promote peace
among the great nation-states.
John Paul II was likewise unable to prevent two
American wars against Iraq. In fact, American Catholics
of the neoconservative faction flew to Rome in hopes of
explaining to him why the war was justified and
necessary. They don't seem to have succeeded in raising
the Holy Father's consciousness, or that of his
Successor, but the war came anyway.
It has turned out to be something other than the
"cakewalk" its promoters expected. As I write, the new
Iraqi government is about to hold the elections President
Bush sees as the antidote to terrorism, though I find his
reasoning hard to follow.
Does he really think a handful of fanatics flew
planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in
frustration because they didn't have the vote?
My sense is that their fury at the United States
government would hardly have been assuaged by possession
of the ballot; my own discontents with U.S. foreign
policy, admittedly somewhat less intense, finds little
relief in my right to cast one of the many millions of
votes that, as they assure me, is the essential exercise
of my liberty and my control of our rulers.
Since roughly half of the eligible voters don't show
up on election day in this country, I gather that a lot
of Americans share my heretical doubts about the efficacy
of democracy. I expect that many Iraqis will soon be
disillusioned too, supposing that they have any illusions
to begin with.
Elections or no elections, some observers whose
judgment I value expect civil war between Sunnis and
Shi'ites to erupt in the near future.
Waiving the big question of whether American
military intervention was justified in the first place,
liberty consists much less in the right to vote than in
more specific personal freedoms -- such traditions as
property rights, immunity from arbitrary arrest, habeas
corpus, freedom of speech and press, and other things
that may take centuries to develop.
These are things the champions of majority rule seem
hardly to appreciate, and indeed it isn't easy to imagine
them originating under rulers like our own.
Would the idea of habeas corpus ever have occurred
to Dick Cheney, or for that matter Abraham Lincoln? We
actually owe most of our real liberties, the ones we
exercise daily rather than at four-year intervals, to
Christianity, to English common law, and to men whose
names we don't even remember.
Unless I'm badly mistaken, very few of them have
been acquired, or strengthened, by invading countries
across the oceans.
Tookie's Reward
If Stanley "Tookie" Williams gets the Nobel Prize
for Peace, it will have to be posthumous. He was finally
executed when California's Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (a
title I'll never get used to) rejected his appeal, and
public pressure, for clemency.
Williams was an amply convicted murderer, often
called the "founder" of the notorious Crips gang. In his
later years, when he had more leisure, he also became the
author of children's books inculcating edifying warnings
against gang violence.
His supporters variously argued that he had repented
and redeemed his crimes or insisted, with the author
himself, that he was innocent of the egregiously cruel
killings he'd been charged with.
Despite his services to peace and literature, I
found it difficult to extend much sympathy to him. I
don't think he should have been put to death, but not
because I thought he was innocent; I believe capital
punishment is wrong for several reasons, no matter how
horrible the criminal is.
Chief among these reasons is that I don't think the
state should have such power. It has nothing to do with
desert or remorse; a man who causes such suffering as
Williams did deserves worse than he got. He may have
deserved torture, but we don't want the state to inflict
that either -- not for the criminal's sake, but for our
own. The ultimate Judge may impose eternal torment, but
we leave that to Him.
Opposing capital punishment, as the last two popes
have done, does not mean sentimentalizing the criminal or
minimizing his crime. It means finding a way to punish
him and protect society from him without debasing
ourselves.
Eugene McCarthy RIP
Gene McCarthy, dead at 89, was the liberal I loved.
I was thrilled when his dramatic 1968 New Hampshire
primary challenge caused Lyndon Johnson to retire from
the office he'd coveted all his life; but McCarthy wasn't
a dramatic man. Without exalting Communism in the least,
he simply saw the futility of the Vietnam War and called
for withdrawal when few politicians dared to. The radical
Left, in fact, regarded him as inadequate or worse.
I met him a couple of times, years later, and found
him just as congenial as I'd hoped. Once in Baton Rouge,
where we were scheduled to debate (I've forgotten the
topic), I enjoyed a long breakfast alone with him and, of
course, got him to reminisce about the year of his glory.
He showed neither vanity nor bitterness as he
recalled how Robert Kennedy had jumped into the
presidential race as soon as McCarthy had shown Johnson's
vulnerability.
Bobby had the magical Kennedy name, the Kennedy
organization, and, not least, the Kennedy money, not to
mention the Kennedy ethics; on the fateful day of the
California primary his troops had flooded Orange County
with leaflets claiming that McCarthy had a plan to bus
blacks there from Watts (this was three years after the
Watts riots).
Needless to say, McCarthy had never even dreamed of
such a thing, but he told me the story without rancor, as
a funny illustration of liberalism, Camelot-style. The
Kennedys had all the power, but McCarthy had all the
class. Anyway, Bobby won the primary but was murdered
during the victory celebration that night.
Our debate didn't come off, because the event turned
into an adoring, cheering McCarthy rally. The crowd still
remembered 1968, and I was cheering as fervently as the
audience.
+ + +
SOBRAN'S wishes each of you a joyous Christmas, with
thanks for your loyalty and kindness. If you have not
seen my monthly newsletter yet, give my office a call at
800-513-5053 and request a free sample, or better yet,
subscribe for two years for just $85. New subscribers get
two gifts with their subscription. More details can be
found at the Subscription page of my website,
www.sobran.com.
Already a subscriber? Consider a gift subscription
for a priest, friend, or relative.
--- Joseph Sobran
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/wanderer/w2005/w051222.shtml".
This column copyright (c) 2005 by THE WANDERER, the
National Catholic Weekly founded in 1867,
www.thewandererpress.com. Reprinted with permission.
This column may not be published in print or Internet
publications without express permission of THE WANDERER.
You may forward it to interested individuals if you use
this entire page, including the following disclaimer:
"THE WANDERER is available by subscription. Write
subscription@thewandererpress.com for information.
Subscription price: $50 per year; $30 for six months.
Checks can be sent to The WANDERER, 201 Ohio Street,
Dept. JS, St. Paul, MN 55107.
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's syndicated columns are
available by e-mail subscription. For details and
samples, see http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
PR@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."
This page copyright (c) 2006 by THE VERE COMPANY.