SOBRAN'S --
The Real News of the Month

August 2001
Volume 8, No. 8

Editor: Joe Sobran
Publisher: Fran Griffin (Griffin Communications)
Managing Editor: Ronald N. Neff
Subscription Rates.
   Print version: $44.95 per year; $85 for 2 years;
   trial subscription available for $19.95 (5 issues).
   E-mail subscriptions: $39.95 for 1 year ($25 with a
   12-month subscription to the print edition); $65 for
   2 years ($45 with a 2-year subscription to the print
  edition). 

Address: SOBRAN'S, P.O. Box 1383, Vienna, VA 22183-1383
Fax: 703-281-6617      Website: www.sobran.com
Publisher's Office: 703-255-2211 or www.griffnews.com
Foreign Subscriptions (print version only): Add $1.25 per
   issue for Canada and Mexico; all other foreign
   countries, add $1.75 per issue.
Credit Card Orders: Call 1-800-513-5053. Allow
   4-6 weeks for delivery of your first issue


CONTENTS
Features
  -> The Moving Picture
  -> Publisher's Note
  -> Before the Hive
  -> For the Record
Nuggets (plus Exclusives to this edition)
List of Columns Reprinted



FEATURES

The Moving Picture
(page 1)

     The Hive's big new cause is stem-cell research, as 
witness a NEWSWEEK cover story posing the issue as 
"embryo research vs. pro-life politics." Research versus 
politics -- get it? The story did mention in passing 
"some 50 groups lobbying for stem-cell research," but 
that's "science," as opposed to "politics." As usual, the 
motives of those who want to protect innocent human life 
are demeaned; those of the killers pass unexamined.

*          *          *

     Among those who want the federal government to 
subsidize the killing of live human embryos are, in 
NEWSWEEK's phrase, "staunch pro-lifers," as in Orrin 
Hatch (who else?), and that predictable "maverick" John 
McCain.

*          *          *

     Seems Roger Clinton took $50,000 from a convicted 
drug dealer named Gambino on a promise to wangle a 
presidential pardon, and brother Bill subsequently asked 
the Justice Department to check Mr. Gambino's 
eligibility. (No pardon was issued.) He's no kin to us, 
says New York's famed Gambino family, who are 
understandably anxious to avoid any impression that 
they're linked to the Clintons.

*          *          *

     Jesse "Papa Don't Preach" Jackson keeps appearing on 
the covers of the tabloids. Enquiring minds want to know: 
Is he still available for spiritual counseling?

*          *          *

     Farewell to Carroll O'Connor, 76, forever Archie, 
our favorite bigot. In spite of the intent of his 
creator, Norman Lear, Archie won America's sympathy, 
thanks to O'Connor's brilliant mugging. Archie was in 
fact a paragon of tolerance, putting up with an 
insufferable free-loading liberal son-in-law.

*          *          *

     Farewell also to Mortimer Adler, 98, "the Great 
Bookie," who promoted the classics for everyman, with 
special regard for Aristotle and Aquinas. Adler had 
studied under John Dewey at Columbia, but he rebelled 
against Dewey's sterile relativism and became a champion 
of the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. He died a 
Catholic -- a fact the NEW YORK TIMES saw unfit to print 
in its obituary.

*          *          *

     The historian has his own past. Joseph Ellis of 
Mount Holyoke College, author of prizewinning books on 
the Founding Fathers, has been exposed as a liar for 
claiming (among other fabrications) to have seen combat 
in Vietnam. Ann Coulter points out that during the 
Clinton impeachment proceedings Ellis also pushed the 
dubious story that Thomas Jefferson begot a son on his 
slave Sally Hemings -- lest the public forget that 
presidential frailty has a long and distinguished 
pedigree.




Publisher's Note
(page 2)

Dear Subscribers,

     Have you gotten your copy of the latest booklet of 
Sobranisms yet? ANYTHING CALLED A "PROGRAM" IS 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL: CONFESSIONS OF A REACTIONARY UTOPIAN is 
a collection of about 250 quotations excerpted from past 
editions of SOBRAN'S. It is small enough to fit in your 
shirt pocket but packs a wallop of vintage Sobran wit and 
wisdom.

     The best news is that it's our gift to you if you 
renew your subscription. Or you can buy it for the low 
price of just $5.95 (including postage). Details on how 
to get it are enclosed. [SEE www.sobran.com/
products.shtml.] We'll also send it along with any gift 
subscriptions or new subscriptions that you wish to buy. 
[See http://www.sobran.com/subscrib.shtml.]


Can you write a title? 
     If you could write the title of this booklet of 
Sobran quotations, what would it be? We are conducting a 
search for the best title for this and future booklets. 
Send suggestions (along with your name) by mail, fax, or 
e-mail (the last two being preferred, if possible). See 
the addresses in the credit box above. If we decide to 
use *your* title, you will receive an acknowledgment in 
the book.


Letters-to-the-Editor column
     Periodically we are going to start printing some of 
your letters in SOBRAN'S. The most likely to be published 
would be a *short* letter with one question or comment 
that Joe could respond to.
     Mail to "Letters to the Editor" at the mailing 
address or fax number above, or e-mail to joe@sobran.com.


Attention Charter Subscriber Wannabes.
     Our exclusive SOBRAN'S benefactor club of those 
donors giving $1,000 or more enjoys an annual anniversary 
luncheon in Washington, D.C. The good news is that you 
don't necessarily have to pay all at once. For just 
$83.33 per month (for 12 months), you can become a 
Charter Subscriber and attend our unique gala affair.

     This year, the Seventh SOBRAN'S Anniversary 
Celebration will be held on Saturday, December 8, 
beginning at 12:30 P.M. The site is the Historic George 
Town Club, 1530 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. Joe promises to give 
another sterling speech and the food and company will be 
exemplary. A flyer with details is enclosed. But you have 
to be in the distinctive Charter Subscribers' Club to 
attend, so join today! [See also www.sobran.com/
charter.shtml.]

*          *          *

     Did you know that Joe's column is syndicated through 
Griffin Internet Syndicate (www.griffnews.com)? Do you 
know the opinion page editor of your local newspaper? I 
need the editor's name *and* e-mail address so that we 
can e-mail a packet of sample Sobran columns. If you can 
help, please mail, fax, or e-mail the information to me 
at griffin@sobran.com. We want to get Joe published in as 
many newspapers as possible.

     Finally, don't forget that prayer can move 
mountains. Since we have mountains to move to get 
SOBRAN'S to be one of the nation's leading publications, 
we need your frequent prayers. Perhaps you would consider 
reading one of the Psalms and offering it as a prayer. 
The Psalms are filled with hardship and danger, but also 
with joy and praise in the Lord, as in Psalm 100: "Cry 
out with joy to the Lord, all the earth. Serve the Lord 
with gladness.... Indeed how good is the Lord! Eternal is 
His merciful love. He is faithful from age to age."

---Fran Griffin



Before the Hive
(pages 3-5)

     Over the past twenty years I've often written about 
"the Hive" -- my nickname for the informal body of 
opinion comprising liberals, socialists, outright 
Communists, and various other strains of "progressive" 
opinion.

     Like an odor, such folk are easier to sense than to 
define. They include assorted activists for specific 
causes, as well as more passive enablers, especially in 
the news media. The Democratic Party is their chief 
American organ.

     The Soviet Union, until it collapsed, was the Queen 
Bee of the Hive. The Worker Bees of the West took their 
bearings -- though not their orders -- from the great 
socialist motherland. They operated sympathetically, but 
independently. Most of them would have felt insulted if 
their Soviet allies had tried to push them around.

     The Hive was not, and is not, a conspiracy; it's 
more a pattern. Naive anti-Communists, seeing the 
pattern, have mistaken it for a conspiracy. The Bees, on 
the other hand, have made their own mistake. Knowing that 
they aren't parties to a conspiracy, they fail to see the 
evident pattern of their collective behavior. By sheer, 
insectlike instinct, they obey not the dictates of a 
foreign power, but the internal logic of their own 
nature, their yearning for a secularist and socialist 
political order.

     This yearning drew the Bees to Communism at one 
period in modern history, but it also survived the 
institutional death of Communism; though Communism was 
profoundly attractive to the Bees as long as it appeared 
viable, Communism as such was never the essence of the 
attraction. Its powerful appeal, during the naive phase 
of the Hive, was simply that the Soviet Union under 
Stalin looked like a winner -- a huge and altogether 
successful experiment in "building a new society" on 
progressive lines. It was also frightening, and during 
the 1930s, dubbed "the Red Decade" by Eugene Lyons (in 
his scathingly witty book of that title), it wielded 
incalculable power even in this country. Such people, 
Lyons wrote, "were drawn to the Great Experiment by its 
magnitude and seeming strength. Under the guise of a 
nobly selfless dedication they were, in fact, identifying 
themselves with Power."

     In fact, the Communists and pro-Communists of the 
Red Decade were distinguished by their real and virtual 
allegiance to the Soviet Union and to Stalin himself. 
Though they may have thought of themselves as 
internationalists who transcended national loyalties, 
they actually transferred their patriotism to a specific 
foreign power, which they defended, justified, and 
celebrated at every turn. It seems almost unbelievably 
naive now, but the evidence Lyons amassed is undeniable. 
THE RED DECADE is packed with the insane eulogies to 
Stalin and Soviet Russia that gushed from American 
liberals in those days. A new civilization was being born 
... Russians were enjoying unprecedented freedom and 
prosperity ... A new Renaissance was thriving ... 
Industrial production was booming ...

     All lies and fantasies -- the very opposite of the 
indescribably grim truth. The vast and cruel tyranny was 
claiming millions of lives, most of them due to a policy 
of forced famine; the survivors lived in utter poverty, 
due equally to tyranny and incompetence; art, culture, 
and intellectual life were being crushed, along with 
religion. Civilization itself was being murdered in 
Russia, with the vociferous approval of free men in the 
still-civilized countries to the West.

     A few honest visitors told the truth. But they were 
shouted down, drowned out, vilified by the organized 
Stalin apologists. These included not only party hacks, 
but prominent and often gifted writers, intellectuals, 
and opinion-makers: Lincoln Steffens, Louis Fischer, John 
Strachey, Maurice Hindus, Malcolm Cowley, Granville 
Hicks, Theodore Dreiser, Dashiell Hammett, Paul de Kruif, 
James Weldon Johnson, Archibald MacLeish, George Soule, 
Langston Hughes, George Seldes, Richard Wright, Newton 
Arvin, Van Wyck Brooks, Kenneth Burke, Erskine Caldwell, 
Dorothy Parker, S.J. Perelman, Irwin Shaw, Irving Stone, 
Vincent Sheean, Upton Sinclair, Carl Van Doren, Louis 
Untermeyer, William Carlos Williams, Lillian Hellman, 
Henry Roth, Max Lerner, Heywood Broun, Ring Lardner Jr., 
and Nathaniel West.

     All in all, an impressive roster. No wonder it took 
a bold man to defy the engineered consensus that Stalin 
and Communism were the wave of the future, the harbingers 
of universal human destiny. Who could suppose that so 
many leading intellectuals were prostituting their minds 
for the sake of a single foreign tyrant? They seemed to 
speak for enlightenment itself.

     It's easy to suppose, now, that Communism was a 
minor part of American life in the Thirties. We have all 
been taught that McCarthy Era hysteria grossly magnified 
the reality. It didn't. Through his iron (though hidden) 
control of sycophantic intellectuals, labor unions, and 
other forces, Stalin wielded enormous power over millions 
of Americans, most of whom had no suspicion of his reach, 
or of his sinister influence over their opinion leaders.

     Stalin *was* Communism. Or rather, Communism became 
whatever Stalin said it was. Indifferent to theory, 
contemptuous of abstractions (and intellectuals), he had 
a crude and undistracted appreciation of power: how to 
get it, how to wield it, how to keep it. His method was 
simple: terror. He murdered those who resisted him; he 
also murdered those who assisted him, lest they acquire 
some claim on him. His ruthlessness was felt through his 
whole global network, and was emulated by his cadres 
abroad. Where murder wasn't possible, character 
assassination would do. The most severe punishments were 
meted out to defectors, and the dread of Stalin's (or his 
underlings') revenge did wonders for party cohesion.

     "Our own American Popular Front," Lyons wrote, 
"though never officially in power as it was in France and 
for a brief period in Spain, penetrated, in various 
degrees, the labor movement, education, the churches, 
college and non-college youth movements, the theater, 
movies, the arts, publishing in all its branches; it 
bored deep into the Federal Government and in many 
communities also into local government; it obtained a 
stranglehold on great sectors of national and local 
relief setups and made-work projects through domination 
of the Workers Alliance, capture of key jobs, and other 
stratagems. At its highest point -- roughly about 1938 -- 
the incredible revolution of the Red Decade had mobilized 
the conscious or the starry-eyed, innocent collaboration 
of thousands of influential American *educators, social 
workers, clergymen, New Deal officials, youth leaders, 
Negro and other racial spokesmen, Social Registerites, 
novelists, Hollywood stars, script writers, and 
directors, trade-union chiefs, men and women of abnormal 
wealth* [my emphasis]. Its echoes could be heard in the 
most unexpected places, including the supposed citadels 
of conservatism and respectability." Apart from its 
omission of journalists, this is a pretty fair catalogue 
of the constituent Bees of today's Hive. Of course time 
has added some new categories: feminists, homosexuals, 
environmentalists, and the like.

     Lyons added that "the complex communist United Front 
tinctured every department of American life while it 
lasted and has left its color indelibly on the mind and 
moral character of the country. Our labor movement, 
politics, arts, culture, and vocabulary still carry its 
imprint."

     If the Hive is spontaneous, the Red Decade *was* 
conspiratorial. Stalin and his helpers were able to 
manipulate "a horde of part-time pseudo-rebels who [had] 
neither courage nor convictions, but only a muddy 
emotionalism and a mental fog which made them an easy 
prey for the arbiters of a political racket." The dreaded 
charge of "red-baiting" (the forerunner of "McCarthyism," 
but far more deadly) was enough to cow into silence most 
criticism of Soviet Communism. And of Stalin himself. 
Anti-Communists risked, and often received, ostracism, 
vicious slander, and personal harassment. It was 
unnerving even to those few who had the nerve and stature 
to withstand it; and it was especially effective in 
deterring the far more numerous weak and timid souls from 
following their example.

     Lyons's book is a shocking reminder of how 
powerfully Communism gripped American public opinion, 
through publishing, entertainment, the labor movement, 
and higher education. Today Communism is dead -- and yet 
it isn't. The power that was once concentrated in a few 
Red hands is now diffused among countless others, but, 
though it doesn't exactly terrorize, it still 
intimidates. As Charles Peguy presciently put it nearly a 
century ago, "We shall never know how many acts of 
cowardice have been motivated by the fear of seeming not 
sufficiently progressive."

     During the Red Decade, Soviet apologists deemed old 
scruples out of place when measuring the Soviet 
achievement. "On the contrary," as Lyons observed, "the 
more distasteful the chore, the greater the credit." 
Repression, purge, forced famine were alternately denied 
and defended. The ten years of the Red Decade were "the 
years of the apotheosis of Stalin. The Revolution had 
been reduced to one man; Marxism, Soviet style, was just 
another name for the whims and blunders of one man; the 
Communist International and all its myriad appendages 
were literally nothing more than his private racket." 
Today's Hive is thoroughly decentralized. Yet it still 
maintains its own highly effective discipline. It has 
refined ideology into a sort of etiquette. "Progressive" 
opinion enjoys the aura of politesse; whereas 
"reactionary" views are felt to be ignorant and boorish.

     The New Deal proved hospitable to Communist 
infiltration. Franklin Roosevelt, though sometimes wary 
of open association, praised Stalin's 1936 constitution 
-- sufficient proof, by the way, that he had no grasp 
whatever of the U.S. Constitution. Joseph Davies, his 
ambassador to Moscow, wrote a famously fatuous book, 
MISSION TO MOSCOW, in praise of Stalin's utopia. Such 
cabinet officers as Frances Perkins (who, Lyons wrote, 
"seems to live in dread of criticism from the Left"), 
Harold Ickes, and Henry Wallace were always ready to lend 
their names and persons to Communist-front groups.

     As for Eleanor Roosevelt, Lyons captures her 
essence: "The First Lady of the land became almost 
standard equipment in setting up any new Innocents' Club 
or in bolstering the prestige of an old one; her 
sympathetic heart, her social-worker enthusiasm and 
ideological naivete made her a perfect subject for 
communist hoaxes.... In the inner circle of activists, I 
was told, she was regarded as one of the party's most 
valuable assets." One precious detail emerged long after 
Lyons's book was published: Mrs. Roosevelt, attending a 
diplomatic function, insisted on being escorted by Alger 
Hiss.

     Stalin could count on his cadres, fellow-travelers, 
and dupes to follow every twist and reverse in his party 
line, but he finally demanded too much even of the most 
gullible. He destroyed his own Popular Front when he made 
his pact with Germany in 1939 and joined the rape of 
Poland. At that point even many hard-core Communists, 
hating Hitler even more than they loved Stalin, at last 
broke away in disgust.

     From that moment, mechanical pro-Communism in 
America was a thing of the past. The Soviet Union lost 
nearly all its American loyalists. Many of them would 
still pine for an "ideal" Communism, and continued to 
regard Soviet Russia as vaguely progressive, but the old 
thrill was gone forever.

     During World War II Stalin enjoyed a temporary 
reconciliation with American liberal opinion; through no 
fault of his own, Soviet Russia was invaded by its German 
allies (as Lyons had predicted) in June 1941, and in 
December the United States entered the war on Stalin's 
side. U.S. Government propaganda lied to the American 
public about its "Russian friends" as shamelessly as the 
Communists and fellow-travelers had lied during the Red 
Decade. At the war's end, the fruits of victory in 
Central Europe were too sweet for Stalin to bother hiding 
his true colors, and American illusions were no longer 
possible.

     Today the liberals have run out of utopias. Russia 
is Russia again, having renounced the Red dream after 
terror devolved into shabbiness; China, though semi-
Commie, can be nobody's ideal; Cuba is both brutal and 
squalid. Even Sweden has lost its charm.

     The Hive no longer believes in socialism, though it 
keeps moving spasmodically toward it out of old habits. 
The victory of market capitalism is too clear, and 
planned economies have proved embarrassing. The Bees have 
to settle for keeping the welfare state -- also semi-
disreputable -- and making hay on abortion, sodomy, 
environmentalism, smoking, whatever promises to allow 
some incremental government growth. During the 
impeachment battle they defended Bill Clinton with the 
same solidarity with which the old Left defended Stalin, 
but it wasn't really the same. Stalin was, after all, a 
far more inspirational figure.

     But the residue of the Red Decade is still with us, 
just as Lyons said sixty years ago. The Hive bears traces 
of its ancestry. It still believes reflexively in the 
state, vilifies its opponents, and, above all, keeps its 
gains. It practices not only a "politics of personal 
destruction," but a politics of *general* destruction, 
in which all social relations are determined by force. It 
believes in power and nothing else.

     Having said all that, I think the strongest 
resemblance between the old Left and the Hive lies in 
their shared hatred of human individuality. To become a 
Bee in this Hive is to surrender, voluntarily and 
eagerly, your own personality; to submerge the self in a 
collectivity; to prefer the buzzing cliche of the group 
to individualized thought and expression; to take 
satisfaction in belonging, and conforming, to a powerful 
mass, while punishing others for failure to conform. This 
is not only a political but a spiritual condition. It was 
true of the Stalinists, and it's true of the Hive. All 
the names have changed since the Thirties, yet you get 
the eerie feeling that the old Stalinists and today's 
Bees are somehow *the same people.*

     The similarity to an insect colony -- where the 
individual exists only functionally, being both 
indistinguishable from and interchangeable with its 
fellows -- is not superficial. It's of the essence. To be 
an insect is to be relieved of the burden of having a 
soul of your own.



For the Record
(page 6)
(Material deleted from the print version for reasons of 
space is contained in square brackets [thus].)

     Nothing, it seems, can dispel the notion that Pope 
Pius XII maintained a "shameful silence" about the 
persecution of Jews during World War II. But Ralph 
McInerny, in his book THE DEFAMATION OF PIUS XII, quotes 
what Jews, prominent and otherwise, were saying at the 
time.

     "Only the Catholic Church protested against the 
Hitlerian onslaught on liberty," said Albert Einstein in 
1940.

     In 1942 London's JEWISH CHRONICLE remarked: "A word 
of sincere and earnest appreciation is due from Jews to 
the Vatican for its intervention in Berlin and Vichy on 
behalf of their tortured co-religionists in France.... 
[It was a step urged, to their honor, by a number of 
Catholics, but for which we may be sure the Holy Father 
himself, with his intense humanity and his clear sighted 
understanding of the true and deadly implications of the 
assaults on the Jewish people, needed no prompting.]"

     Dr. Alexander Shafran, chief rabbi of Romania, wrote 
in 1944: "In these hard times our thoughts turn more than 
ever with respectful gratitude to the Sovereign Pontiff, 
who has done so much for Jews in general.... In our worst 
hours of trial, the generous aid and noble support of the 
Holy See ... has been decisive. It is not easy to find 
the proper words to express the relief and solace which 
the magnanimous gesture of the Supreme Pontiff has given 
us, in offering a large subsidy in order to alleviate the 
sufferings of the deported Jews. Roumanian Jewry will 
never forget these facts of historical importance."

     After the Allies liberated Rome in 1944, a Jewish 
Brigade Group said in its BULLETIN: "To the everlasting 
glory of the people of Rome and the Roman Catholic Church 
we can state that the fate of the Jews was alleviated by 
their truly Christian offers of assistance and shelter. 
Even now, many still remain in the religious homes and 
houses which opened their doors to protect them from 
deportation to certain death."

     One survivor, quoted in a Hebrew daily in Israel, 
said: "If we have been rescued, if Jews are still alive 
in Rome, come with us and thank the Pope in the Vatican."

     A committee of the American Jewish Welfare Board, 
wrote to Pius himself: "We have received reports from our 
military chaplains in Italy of the aid and protection to 
Italian Jews by the Vatican, priests, and church 
institutions during the Nazi occupation of the country. 
We are deeply moved by this extraordinary display of 
Christian love -- the more so as we know the risk 
incurred by those who afforded shelter to Jews.... From 
the bottom of our hearts we send you the assurances of 
undying gratitude."

     The elders of one liberated camp went to Rome and 
presented Pius with a letter: "Now that the victorious 
Allied troops have broken our chains and liberated us 
from captivity and danger, may we, the Jewish internees 
of Ferramonti, be permitted to express our deepest and 
devoted thanks for the comfort and help which Your 
Holiness deigned to grant us with fatherly concern and 
infinite kindness throughout our years of internment and 
persecution.... In doing so Your Holiness has as the 
first and highest authority on earth fearlessly raised 
his universally respected voice, in the face of our 
powerful enemies, in order to defend openly our rights to 
the dignity of man.... When we were threatened with 
deportation to Poland in 1942, Your Holiness extended his 
fatherly hand to protect us, and stopped the transfer of 
the Jews interned in Italy, thereby saving us from almost 
certain death. With deep confidence and hope that the 
work of Your Holiness may be crowned with further 
success, we beg to express our heartfelt thanks while we 
pray to the Almighty: May Your Holiness reign for many 
years on this Holy See and exert your beneficent 
influence over the destiny of the nations."

     A few months later the World Jewish Congress sent a 
telegram to the Holy See thanking it for its protection 
"under difficult conditions to the persecuted Jews in 
German dominated Hungary."

     The chief rabbi of Jerusalem, Isaac Herzog, said: "I 
thank the Pope and the Church from the bottom of my heart 
for all the help they have afforded."

     Moshe Sharett, a leading Zionist, summed up his 
personal interview with Pius: "I told him that my first 
duty was to thank him, and through him, the Catholic 
Church, on behalf of the Jewish public, for all they had 
done in the various countries to rescue Jews, to save 
children, and Jews in general. We are deeply grateful to 
the Catholic Church for what she did in those countries 
to help save our brothers."

     Dr. Leon Kubowitzky of the World Jewish Council 
offered a large monetary donation to the Vatican "in 
recognition of the work of the Holy See in rescuing Jews 
from Fascist and Nazi persecutions."

     Raffaele Cantoni of Italy's Jewish Welfare Committee 
said: "The Catholic Church and the papacy have given 
proof that they have saved as many Jews as they could."

     These noble and moving words require little comment. 
I record them here for the honor of Pius, the Catholic 
Church, and the good men who uttered them.



NUGGETS

CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: The Justice Department reports a sharp 
decline in AIDS-related deaths in prisons -- only 242 in 
1999, down from a peak of 1010 in 1995, but HIV 
infections in prisons are increasing. Homosexual rape, a 
common feature of life behind bars, is ugly enough; but 
now it threatens to become lethal. You don't have to be a 
bleeding-heart reformer to ask why a criminal conviction 
should entail the risk of death. (page 9)

SECULARISM IN ONE LESSON: The separation of church and 
state seems to mean chiefly that the Ten Commandments 
don't apply to the government -- particularly those 
forbidding killing, stealing, and coveting. (page 10)


Exclusive to the electronic version:

LATE HIT: New disclosures from Russia inform us that 
Joseph Stalin had an illegitimate son by a 14-year-old 
girl. Why are we only learning this *now?* What Uncle 
Joe did in his private life was his own business, as long 
as it didn't interfere with his performance of his public 
duties.

THE FASHIONABLE CONSCIENCE: Justice Sandra Day O'Connor 
intimates that she has qualms about the death penalty: 
"If statistics are any indication, the system may well be 
allowing some innocent defendants to be executed." Very 
true, but why are the workings of the "system," at the 
state level, the business of the federal judiciary? And 
by the way, why isn't Justice O'Connor troubled that the 
system allows innocent babies to be aborted? 



REPRINTED COLUMNS (pages 7-12)

* The Age of the Misfit (June 7, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010607.shtml

* The Judiciary and the Rule of Law (June 12, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010612.shtml

* Bowdlerizing C.S. Lewis (June 19, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010619.shtml

* Baseball's Knight (June 26, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010626.shtml

* In the Name of "Civil Liberties" (June 28, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010628.shtml

* John Locke in the Middle East (July 3, 2001)
http://www.sobran.com/columns/010703.shtml

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All articles are written by Joe Sobran

You may forward this newsletter if you include the 
following subscription and copyright information:

Subscribe to the Sobran E-Package. 
See http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml
or http://www.griffnews.com for details and samples
or call 800-513-5053.

Copyright (c) 2001 by The Vere Company. All rights
reserved.
Distributed by the Griffin Internet Syndicate 
www.griffnews.com with permission.


[ENDS]