The Reactionary Utopian
August 23, 2007
UNDERWORLD AND OVERWORLD
by Joe Sobran
We're supposed to smirk automatically at the phrase
"conspiracy theory," as if the very idea of a conspiracy
were somehow outlandish and, well, paranoid. But federal
prosecutors seem to have made a pretty convincing case
that Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh conspired to blow
up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City
in 1995. At least nobody is suggesting that all the
jurors in the two trials were loco.
The idea of conspiracy is essential to criminal law.
It means nothing more than secret cooperation to commit
criminal acts. It's implicit in such common expressions
as "accomplice," "organized crime," and "getaway car."
The alternative is to believe that criminals always act
alone. Yes, and musicians always play solo.
Of course there are silly conspiracy theories. That
doesn't mean that there aren't also sane and
sophisticated conspiracy theories. Those who
indiscriminately deride curiosity about conspiracy are
often trying to steer our attention away from the
possibility of official corruption, the existence of
which is pretty well attested.
But the most damaging corruption may not consist in
illegal acts. Just as there is a criminal "underworld"
that continuously conspires to break the law, you can
think of the political process as the working of an
"overworld" in a sort of continuous conspiracy to remake
the laws to suit itself.
If the widget industry can get tax subsidies by
persuading legislators to make laws in its favor, no
crime has been committed. And this can be accomplished
without gross bribery. Key senators and congressmen may
be receptive to the argument that new, high-tech widgets
are vital to national defense (and might be manufactured
in those honorable gentlemen's states). This patriotic
proposal may be transacted over an informal lunch,
immensely boosting the profits of the widget industry,
and the taxpayer never the wiser.
When there are no limits on what the taxing power
may be used for, you are bound to get a whole class of
people seeking to have it used in their behalf. What
would otherwise be illegal -- taking people's earnings by
force -- becomes legal when a government does it (just as
inflating the currency, otherwise known as
counterfeiting, becomes "increasing the money supply"
when a government does or authorizes it).
The class of people who live and prosper by
discreetly arranging to have their larceny legalized is
what I mean by the "overworld." Their ranks include
politicians, businessmen, educators, and many others.
Because they control the legislative process, they not
only don't have to commit crimes, they don't even think
of themselves as shady operators.
These folks do share certain characteristic
attitudes. They dislike "extremism," by which they mean
any political principle that would keep government power
and activity to a minimum. They are equally opposed to
communism and "cutthroat capitalism" (whose evils they
impartially equate with those of communism). They believe
in an "affirmative role" for government, "flexible,"
"compassionate," and "adapted to today's needs." They
tout the virtues of "compromise." They favor
"partnership" between government and "the private
sector," because the modern world is so "complex" and
"interdependent." And of course they are scornful of
"conspiracy theories."
Such people always sound reasonable, and they are
the type who control the government. If their sense of
honor isn't very strong, it would also be hard to catch
them doing anything flatly illegal.
They aren't a secret cabal or a closed society.
Anyone can join their ranks -- anyone who wants to play
the angles, to use the government for his own special
benefit at the expense of the unsuspecting taxpayer.
An overworld exists in every society, a parasite
class that figures out how to get others to work for them
while keeping the law on their side. In many societies
there are outright lords and slave owners who may
directly command their serfs and bondsmen; in a nominally
egalitarian society a more devious approach is necessary.
You may be working much of the day to support your
neighbor without knowing it. You know that a lot of your
income goes to the government, but you don't exactly know
where it goes from there. That's how the system is
designed to work.
[This column was originally published by Universal Press
Syndicate December 25, 1997.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2007/070823.shtml".
Copyright (c) 2007 by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation.
This column may not be published in print or Internet
publications without express permission of Fitzgerald
Griffin Foundation. You may forward it to interested
individuals if you use this entire page, including the
following disclaimer:
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
FGF@vacoxmail.com, or call 800-513-5053."