The Reactionary Utopian
August 21, 2007
THOSE DIZZY FEMINISTS
by Joe Sobran
One definition of a misogynist might be a man who
thinks feminists are typical of women. The feminist
movement seems to lack a thermostat: it keeps overheating
madly.
In his new book, THE END OF SANITY (just published
by Avon Books), Martin L. Gross lists hundreds of
examples of ideological lunacy, on race, sex, religion,
and other topics. But feminist examples surpass all
others, in both quantity and preposterous quality.
It has been decreed, somewhere or other, that the
sexes are not only equal but barely distinguishable, so
that any differences between them are due to untold
centuries of male domination. Of course the very fact
that men have dominated women so utterly throughout
recorded history might be considered prima facie evidence
of male superiority, rather than a mere refusal to
recognize women's equality; but maybe that's just
phallocentric male logic speaking.
In any case, enlightenment has finally arrived. We
have the privilege of living in the age where the
insignificance of sexual differences has, at long last,
been not only established, but codified in law and
manners, and even in the armed forces.
Thus 350 women were sent into "combat duty" aboard
the USS Eisenhower (named for Mamie Eisenhower, one
trusts). Despite a rule against "fraternization" between
the sexes, Gross notes, six couples soon asked to be
married by the captain, while several "sailors" got
pregnant and had to be removed from the ship.
At newly nonsexist West Point, a female officer, Lt.
Col. Maureen LeBoeuf, is now "Master of the Sword," in
charge of physical fitness for all cadets. When asked why
female cadets are required to do only 18 push-ups, while
males are still required to do 42, "she replied that
women are almost as qualified physically as men were 40
years ago."
In the movie G.I. JANE, Demi Moore was absurdly
shown as a super-tough recruit in the Navy SEALS, kicking
lots of Arab males around (and showing up American males
in the process). Nobody seems to have informed Ms. Moore,
the producers, or the scriptwriters that a sailor isn't a
"G.I." Getting such details right might have enhanced the
film's gritty realism. (Unlike, say, Bruce Willis,
Ms. Moore needed a stuntperson to do her calisthenics.)
Back in civilian life, Gross notes, the stock
brokerage firm of Gruntal & Co. has adopted a policy of
firing men for sexual harassment if they so much as stare
at women, or ask a coworker for a date after having been
turned down once.
Chivalry, though not dead, is well-nigh illegal. The
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission officially
decrees that a "pattern of complimenting a woman" can be
grounds for a sexual harassment suit.
Even the pettiest hurt feelings can be gussied up as
political causes. A student at the University of
Minnesota, for example, accused a professor of "sexual
harassment" because (she said) he paid more attention to
the men's term papers than to hers.
On the one hand, feminists insist that women are
just as capable as men, physically and intellectually. On
the other hand, they, like other claimants of official
victimhood, always insist that existing standards be
lowered -- or even that new double standards be adopted!
-- to enable them to compete. Actually, it's competition
their claims are designed to avoid.
Such claims of equality are really admissions of
inferiority. Jewish males dominate many professions; they
weren't given favors, and they never asked that law and
medical schools lower standards for Jews to compensate
for "past discrimination." Black males dominate
professional sports, but not because anyone pitched
underhand to Jackie Robinson to atone for slavery and
segregation.
Today the old culture of achievement has given way
to a culture of whining, in which achievement is actually
suspect -- interpreted as evidence of privilege or unfair
advantage. In this atmosphere, the only way to get
equality is to demand compensatory privilege (reinforced
by silly fictions).
But people who are really oppressed don't want
double standards, because double standards are the very
things that oppress them. We're laboring to solve
problems that no longer exist.
[This column was originally published by Universal Press
Syndicate January 8, 1998.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2007/070821.shtml".
Copyright (c) 2007 by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation.
This column may not be published in print or Internet
publications without express permission of Fitzgerald
Griffin Foundation. You may forward it to interested
individuals if you use this entire page, including the
following disclaimer:
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
FGF@vacoxmail.com, or call 800-513-5053."