The Reactionary Utopian
January 5, 2006
BUSH'S ALPHA MALE
by Joe Sobran
What's the proper form of address for a terrorist
with a long record of mass murder? Emily Post doesn't
cover this one, but in the state of Israel his title may
be "Mr. Prime Minister."
The political career of Ariel Sharon, successor of
such democratic leaders as Menachem Begin and Yitzhak
Shamir, appears to have ended at last. As he lies in a
Jerusalem hospital after a possibly fatal stroke, the
future of his country, the Middle East, and much more may
depend on his fate.
Not since Joseph Stalin have American politicians
and opinion leaders fawned so revoltingly over a foreign
ruler. President George W. Bush calls Sharon "a man of
courage and peace." Neoconservatives regard him as a
hero, almost beyond criticism -- except when he makes
concessions to Palestinians. The New York DAILY NEWS
hails him as "the world's best hope for peace in the
Middle East," "a leader of unparalleled vision and
courage," and "the personification of the nation's
centrist aspirations." Like Stalin, who had his own Amen
Corner, Sharon has many well-placed apologists in this
country, ready to justify him at every turn. Rush
Limbaugh has likened him to George Washington.
Sharon achieved his greatest worldwide fame in 1982
when he led the Israeli invasion of Lebanon and arranged
the grisly slaughter of about 2,000 refugees, including
women and children of all ages, in the Sabra and Shatila
camps near Beirut. Hundreds of thousands of shocked
Israelis protested in the streets, but after an official
inquiry he got off with a reprimand.
But his ruthlessness also added to his popularity,
and he came back from apparent political ruin to become
leader of the Likud Party and finally, five years ago,
prime minister. He showed his courage and vision by
adopting such policies as the "target assassinations" of
Palestinian leaders (along with any unfortunate
bystanders), including, last year, the killing of a blind
quadriplegic in a wheelchair.
Bush and Britain's prime minister, Tony Blair, tried
to terrify the world with the prospect that Saddam
Hussein might acquire a single nuclear weapon. But
neither of them has ever expressed the slightest anxiety
that the fanatical Sharon should possess one of the
greatest nuclear arsenals on Earth, enough to annihilate
the Arab world -- as the Arabs are well aware. Is it any
wonder that Anglo-American hypocrisy has become so
notorious?
There is grim comedy in the way Bush has praised
Sharon as a great humanitarian, while at the same time
trying to coax him to behave in a minimally civilized
manner. Like a feckless parent trying to control a
spoiled child by indulging him (to the disgust and
annoyance of his company), Bush has too little
self-respect to mind very much when his Israeli pal makes
him look like a fool. He has tried to keep smiling
through every indignity Sharon could inflict on him.
In this respect, though Blair has nothing to be
proud of, he has much less to be ashamed of. A residual
sense of the absurd has prevented him from lauding Sharon
with Bush's egregious extravagance. British public
opinion is humane enough to sympathize with the
Palestinians and to be embarrassed by its alliance with
Israel, especially under a brute like Sharon. If British
politics isn't exactly moral, it's at least restrained by
some good taste.
Besides, Bush is intimidated by Sharon, as Franklin
Roosevelt was by Stalin. Ruthless men can have this
daunting effect on weak men, causing them to say things
they know to be the opposite of the truth; and Sharon has
known what is only too obvious to everyone, that Bush
can't stand up to him. He has been Bush's Alpha Male.
We can hope that Bush will be at least a little less
timid with Sharon's successor. He must sense that his
timidity before a tiny country has earned him the world's
contempt, and maybe a part of him will even feel relief
if Sharon dies. He'll no longer have to be the 97-pound
weakling in the relationship, hoping he won't be
humiliated.
America doesn't have much to show for its expensive
entanglement with Israel, but it has given us a good look
at the stuff our rulers are made of. No patriot can take
much pride in it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2006/060105.shtml".
Copyright (c) 2006 by the Griffin Internet Syndicate,
www.griffnews.com. This column may not be published in
print or Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate. You may forward it to
interested individuals if you use this entire page,
including the following disclaimer:
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
PR@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."