THE ACQUITTAL
June 14, 2005
by Joe Sobran
As you may have heard by the time you read this,
Michael Jackson has been acquitted on all ten of the
charges brought against him. At least if you haven't
heard, you're probably not checking your smoke signals
often enough.
I love what the Roman fellow said: "Nothing human is
alien to me." But I've long regarded Michael Jackson as
the test case of that venerable adage. Even in
California, he stands out.
Still, I'm relieved that he wasn't convicted. If
it's the government versus Michael Jackson -- or, as they
say, The People v. Michael Jackson -- I'll root for
Michael every time. Too many of the people have been
having too much unholy glee at Michael's expense. They
remind me of the mob who turned out to punish the woman
caught committing adultery, with the law on their side
and stones in their hands. Jesus didn't criticize the
law, but he suggested that the first stone be thrown by
some guy who'd never sinned himself. The woman walked
(albeit with a firm warning).
As the prosecution brought lurid testimony against
Jacko, I asked myself how I might be made to look if the
government could invite, or force, all the acquaintances
I've ever made to testify against me. The truth would be
bad enough; but add to that the lies that my enemies
would be glad to repeat, and which the public would be
willing to believe, and even an acquittal wouldn't do
much to repair the damage.
In Jacko's case, of course, there's a special angle.
Child molesting is one of those things -- like
flag burning, pot smoking, and Holocaust denial -- that
cause some people to freak out. It's not enough to say
you're against them; if you oppose them with anything
less than hysteria, some readers are sure to assume you
favor them. One of the things writing for a living
teaches you is that, no matter how clearly you think
you've written, people may read the most bizarre things
into your work, clean opposite to what you've actually
said.
I used to freak over child molesting myself. I once
suspected a houseguest of having lewd designs on my
grandson, though I couldn't prove it, so I invented a
feeble pretext for requiring him to leave. On another
occasion an in-law was convicted of sodomizing boys.
To my surprise, I found myself unable to dislike or
despise either man. I pitied them both. They were
afflicted with a temptation God had spared me. Imagine
living with an illicit desire so vehemently condemned by
society!
This is the part where some people would no doubt
condemn discrimination against child molesters -- or
"pedophilic Americans," as they'd no doubt call them. And
this is just where I think it's important to keep a
difficult balance and sense of proportion between sin and
sinner.
Child molesting is a serious sin. Even liberals
don't make light of it. But it's the prevalent hysteria
on the subject that gives me pause. By all means,
children should be protected from it; I've also known
kids whose lives were terribly damaged by it (girls, I
think, more than boys). And yet others seem to suffer no
permanent or irreparable harm. The vice has been commonly
accepted in some civilizations, and most of their members
seem to have been pretty normal.
St. Thomas Aquinas held that most sexual sins were
mortal, since they abuse our life-giving faculties, yet
also that they were less serious than other mortal sins,
because they are merely carnal, not spiritual. Of course
they may be more grave when they also involve infidelity,
seduction, and betrayal, which are not merely sins of the
flesh, but offenses against justice, charity, and other
duties.
Today some people openly defend pedophilia, and no
doubt many others secretly approve of it. This shouldn't
surprise us. American culture, once notoriously
puritanical, now contemns the virtue of chastity, and if
Michael Jackson had made a reputation for collecting
women, he'd be widely admired in the same publications
that now want to stone him.
But when he's suspected of collecting boys -- a
suspicion he's done little to discourage -- even liberals
become raging Puritans. Jacko must be wondering what the
rules are in this country nowadays. Hugh Hefner, our
senior philosopher, has never explained why, if sexual
pleasure is essentially good, it's depraved when enjoyed
with children.
We no longer recognize anything as a sin, but we
still want to have our public sinners. Stoning them is so
much fun.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2005/050614.shtml".
Copyright (c) 2005 by the Griffin Internet Syndicate,
www.griffnews.com. This column may not be published in
print or Internet publications without express permission
of Griffin Internet Syndicate. You may forward it to
interested individuals if you use this entire page,
including the following disclaimer:
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
PR@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."