FREE AND INDEPENDENT
September 11, 2003
by Joe Sobran
A recent biography of Thomas Jefferson contains an
amusing statement. It says that Jefferson's arguments in
the 1798 Kentucky Resolutions "brought him dangerously
close to secessionism."
Apparently the biographer doesn't realize that
Jefferson was an explicit secessionist. For openers, he
wrote a famous secessionist document known to posterity
as the Declaration of Independence.
The Declaration proclaims the 13 American colonies
"Free and Independent States" -- adding "that as Free and
Independent States, they have full Power to levy War,
conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce,
and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent
States may of right do."
Note the plural. Jefferson weighed his words with
utmost care, and he didn't speak of these states as a
single thing -- certainly not as the single, monolithic
"new nation" Lincoln later called them. Each state was
independent not only of Britain, but of the other states
as well. They were united only in "alliance."
The Articles of Confederation would soon repeat the
point: "Each State retains its sovereignty, freedom, and
independence." The 1783 Treaty of Paris, concluding peace
with Britain, spoke of the "free, sovereign, and
independent states," listing them all by name. The
Constitution always refers to the United States in the
plural and never refers to them as a "nation."
When the Constitution was presented for
ratification, the Union was briefly dissolved. It was
reunited as the states ratified the Constitution. Any
state that declined to ratify it would have remained
outside the Union, but in the end all rejoined. Even so,
three states ratified on the express condition that they
reserved the right to "resume" or "reassume" the powers
they had delegated to the Union -- that is, to withdraw
from the Union. The right to secede, or "separate," was
taken for granted.
In the Kentucky Resolutions, which every thoughtful
American should study carefully, Jefferson reminded his
countrymen that the nature of the Union was that of a
voluntary confederation of those free and independent
states. It was not a capitulation to a new sovereign
power. The powers of the Federal Government were limited,
specific, and delegated; and if it exceeded them the
states must have some recourse.
The Resolutions were written in protest against the
Alien and Sedition Acts, which Jefferson saw as
unconstitutional. It's now generally agreed that he was
right. He stressed that if the Federal Government were to
be the final and exclusive authority on what the
Constitution meant, it would be free to define the extent
of its own powers -- which would defeat the whole purpose
of a written constitution.
On this occasion Jefferson didn't call for
secession, but later secessionists would draw on his
powerful arguments. He treasured the Union, but he
abhorred the idea that the states could or should be kept
in the Union by force. They were still, in principle,
"Free and Independent States." They could remain free and
independent only if they remained sovereign.
In 1816 Jefferson would write that "if any state in
the Union will declare that it prefers separation ... to
a continuance in union ... I have no hesitation in
saying, 'Let us separate.'" He hoped it would never come
to that, but he saw that the ultimate right to withdraw
from the Union was essential to the Union's free and
voluntary character.
Though he regarded slavery as a great wrong that
would have to be corrected, Jefferson would certainly
have agreed that the Southern states had the right to
secede in 1860. His grandson George Wythe Randolph served
the Confederacy as a general in the army and as secretary
of war.
In the early nineteenth century there had been many
separation movements, most of them in New England, and
the right to secede was generally unchallenged. The first
president to deny a state's right to leave the Union was
Andrew Jackson, who threatened to keep South Carolina in
the Union by force if necessary. The idea of invading a
state shocked even strong Unionists like Daniel Webster.
But Abraham Lincoln would adopt Jackson's views in his
first inaugural address, and he acted on them ruthlessly.
The curious thing is that both Jackson and Lincoln
claimed devotion to Jefferson's principles, as nearly
everyone did in those days. But they ignored the part
about "Free and Independent States." Today it would be
absurd to describe the states as independent -- or free.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Read this column on-line at
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2003/030911.shtml".
Copyright (c) 2003 by the Griffin Internet
Syndicate, www.griffnews.com. This column may not
be published in print or Internet publications
without express permission of Griffin Internet
Syndicate. You may forward it to interested
individuals if you use this entire page,
including the following disclaimer:
"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available
by subscription. For details and samples, see
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write
fran@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."