Telling the Story
April 3, 2003

by Joe Sobran

     This being a "war of choice," rather than a war 
forced on us by urgent necessity (as it is for Iraq), 
can't we at least ask for candor about the cost? I don't 
mean only in American blood and treasure, important as 
they are, but in Iraqi casualties, both military and 
civilian.

     We deserve something more than propaganda. If our 
government is going to make us bitter enemies, we have a 
right to know that. This war is being fought in our name, 
and we are going to pay for it -- in more ways than one.

     Many hawks feel that free speech ends at the water's 
edge. (Not that they're crazy about it on our own 
shores.) They are furious at Sean Penn for saying in Iraq 
what he had an unquestioned right to say in America, even 
though the war hadn't started yet. They are doubly 
furious at Peter Arnett for saying what he thought in 
Iraq once the United States had started bombing. American 
journalists are supposed to be "embedded" in the war 
effort, observing "message discipline." That is, they are 
expected to stop practicing journalism without a 
government-issued license.

     In war, the adage has it, truth is the first 
casualty. But if your cause is just, why do you need lies 
and concealment? If your troops are fighting for freedom 
-- including "Iraqi freedom" -- why not allow events to 
be reported freely? If you are sitting at home, cheering 
the war while watching it on television, shouldn't you at 
least be willing to face what you're supporting? Or does 
the war have to be edited for family viewing?

     The hawks are suspicious of the American news media, 
which they feel aren't parroting war propaganda with due 
zeal. In their eyes, even frank reporting, if it 
contradicts official optimism, amounts to treason. 
According to the fanatical NEW YORK POST, the NEW YORK 
TIMES is a "fifth column" of the enemy. Yet any serious 
reader knows which paper to read for dispassionate 
information, and which paper reduces journalism to a bad 
joke.

     Never mind that without frank reporting the freedom 
of the press is meaningless. If this is really a war for 
freedom, ours as well as Iraq's, why shouldn't we 
exercise our own freedoms? I'm afraid the answer is all 
too obvious.

     The American media are the least of the hawks' 
problems. They should be worrying about the foreign 
media, especially the Arab network Al-Jazeera. The 
American media are showing a serial that might be called 
"Brave American Soldiers." The Arab media are showing a 
different story: "Dead and Maimed Arab Women and 
Children." And that's the one most of the world is 
watching. The U.S. global media monopoly is over.

     The Bush administration doesn't seem to grasp this. 
It expects the world to accept its rigid and lame self-
justifications, and is utterly unprepared for the 
propaganda war that may be more decisive in the long run 
than what happens in battle. Perception may not be 
reality, but it's certainly an important reality, 
especially in the Media Age, and it's out of the U.S. 
Government's control.

     Which story is true? In a war that isn't decisive. 
It isn't the righteous side that prevails, but the side 
with the more powerful weapons, and in the contest for 
world opinion, the Arab story is far more powerful than 
the American story. Pictures of dead children can't be 
counteracted by pictures of nice Marines carrying live 
children. Pictures of dead American children killed by 
Iraqis might help, but there aren't any.

     When, 40 years ago, the young Cassius Clay (now the 
beloved old Muhammad Ali) challenged the thuggish Sonny 
Liston for the world heavyweight championship, he was so 
cocky and abrasive that one sportswriter quipped, "Clay 
has achieved the unlikely feat of making Liston the 
sentimental favorite."

     Similarly, George W. Bush has achieved the unlikely 
feat of making the brutal Saddam Hussein the sentimental 
favorite in the Arab world and beyond. Like his hero 
Stalin, Hussein knows how to enlist the passions of 
nationalism when he needs them. An invasion always helps.

     Our own media are barely reporting this media war. 
But if the United States wins on the ground, yet winds up 
isolated in a hostile world, what will it have gained?

     A happy ending depends on who's telling the story. 
And America isn't the world's storyteller anymore.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read this column on-line at 
"http://www.sobran.com/columns/2003/030403.shtml".

Copyright (c) 2003 by the Griffin Internet 
Syndicate, www.griffnews.com. This column may not 
be published in print or Internet publications 
without express permission of Griffin Internet 
Syndicate. You may forward it to interested 
individuals if you use this entire page, 
including the following disclaimer:

"SOBRAN'S and Joe Sobran's columns are available 
by subscription. For details and samples, see 
http://www.sobran.com/e-mail.shtml, write 
fran@griffnews.com, or call 800-513-5053."